God in Christianity
Within the scope of Christianity and its
denominations, there exists a mass confusion with regards to God's oneness and Jesus's divinity. Unitarians, Roman Catholics, Protestants,
Oneness Pentecostals, and the Jehovah's Witness, each have given their
exclusive views on the issue. This author, however, looks to bring a common
understanding between the Churches, an understanding agreed upon universally by
all Biblical scholars.
The Bible, along with its Christian scholars,
teach of a significant difference between the “flesh” and the “spirit” (see
John
Now the question for Christians is - do they, the Christians, worship the flesh
of Jesus Christ or the spirit of God that dwelled with Jesus? The Christians
will always talk about their concept known as “Jesus was God in the flesh”.
Does this mean that the flesh itself is divine (God), or does it mean that God
dwells with the flesh spiritually? Obviously the statement says God IN (within)
the flesh, not God IS the flesh. Coming back to the clear
distinction between the flesh and the spirit which the Bible makes while
simultaneously noting the fact that the Bible is VERY clear that God is spirit.
At this point, the evangelical Christians will agree, because this fundamental
doctrine has always been a strict teaching of Christianity - the difference
between the flesh and the spirit and how God is spirit. ALL Christians believe
this.
So, if you are not worshiping the flesh of Jesus, and admit that the flesh of
Jesus is a creation of God, while the spirit of God is eternal and uncreated,
then you admit, that the physical and finite individual known as Jesus, who
walked the earth 2000 years ago, ate, slept , drank, and spent 9 months in Mary's
womb is not what you worship, and was not literally and physically God, but it
was the spirit of God that dwelled with that flesh - man - created material,
and its that spirit which you worship as your God. Correct? Obviously!
So now we have taken an important step. You now know that the Bible teaches you
not to worship the physical man - or the graven
image, known as Jesus, rather you are worshiping God, who is a spirit, that
same spirit of God that dwells within you, and within ALL:
One God is Father of ALL, who is above ALL, and through ALL, and in ALL.
(Ephesians 4:6; also see many more verses which say the same thing: John 17:20;
John 14:20; Psalms 82:6)
The name Jesus was given to the son of Mary, who was a physical-created
material-man that, slept, ate, drank, and like any other man fell prostrate to
the laws of nature. Jesus was flesh, who according to you DIED. But God, the
spirit, is eternal, and never dies. IE. Jesus, the
man, was not God. The Spirit that dwelled “in” Jesus, and dwells IN ALL, is
what you are supposed to revere and worship. You fail to make the distinction
between Jesus the flesh and God the Spirit. When you say 100% God 100% Man;
what do you mean? That God, who is spirit, and Jesus who is flesh, are one
"spiritually", but yet not physically because God is beyond finite
physics, is that not correct? God is not physical-finite-flesh-created. Man is
physical-finite-flesh-created. God is metaphysical-infinite-spirit-uncreated. Right? Make the distinction between who Jesus is (the 100%
man) and who God is (100% spirit). I sincerely believe that Christians
unintentionally worship the created man - Jesus, and not the uncreated spirit -
God.
With all of this said, there are a bunch sparks
that fly, and rightfully so, they should. Therefore, consider this: Was Jesus
divine at the state of being an unfertilized egg? Was he divine while in the
womb? As an infant? As a toddler?
A child? An adolescent? Or
did Jesus become God in his state of adulthood?
Furthermore, according to Christianity, when
God's spirit dwelled within Jesus, and Jesus was "God in the flesh",
as they say, did God become limited to the flesh of Jesus Christ, or was God
still omnipresent? If He, God, was still omnipresent, as Christianity teaches,
than God was not limited to the finite-flesh of Jesus, thus, Jesus was not the
all-knowing, omnipresent, infinite God, but was simply a particle within God's
creation.
And finally it is absolutely important to note
that it is biologically illogical
for God to have a son. If you are to
believe that God had offspring in the literal and biological sense, then you
fall into a dilemma. In order for God to be the biological father of Jesus, if
that makes any sense at all, God had to supplement several components into this
child such as a set chromosomes, DNA, a genetic
sequence etc. In order for one to be called a biological father, these
components have to exist, there is no other way around
it. To assume that God personally has a genetic makeup that ensures the
possibility of biological offspring is absurd. Rather God can simply CREATE
something out of nothing, as was the case with both Adam, and also the Messiah.
This creating out of nothing does not make God a biological father because it
simply goes beyond the surface of biology. Therefore, Christians have to come
to the conclusion that Jesus was not the literal and biological son of God, but
metaphorically and spiritually Jesus was a “child” of many spiritual “children”
of God.